The Genesis of Sporting Events as Social Facts
Maximiliano E. Korstanje
RICIT. Nro. 12- 2018 (pp. 60-75) ISSN-e: 2588-0861
for policy-makers to manage events: cultural exploration, novelty, recovery needs,
socialization and gregariousness (Crompton & McKay, 1997). Even if the effects of
event-management were widely studied, results are contradictory or subject to
controversy. While Prentice & Andersen (2003) acknowledge “the organic destination
image” is the key factor which correlates with Event Management, others academicians
as Berlanga Adell (2004) focuses on micro interactional variables, as socialization,
adjoined to the reduction of rivalries between hosts and guests. Not surprisingly, under
contexts of political disputes, geographical discrepancies or previous conflictive states
of war, tourism is far from reducing hostility from locals to tourists but under some
other contexts, tourism and event management can be used as an instrument of peace-
building. Korstanje, in earlier studies, has documented the historical conflict between
Argentinians and Chileans over the recent decades. Though both countries shared an
extensive borderland, plausible of many conflicts and misunderstandings, the return of
democracy cemented the possibility of a new hypothesis of warfare. Anyway, far from
being controlled, the hostility between Chilean tourists and Argentinians still remains
alive. In this context, sports competence not only fails in reducing the long-simmering
sentiment of hostility but sometimes may very well aggravate it. What is more
important, since locals come across with a subordinated role respecting to tourists, the
sentiment of hate is temporarily masqueraded (Korstanje 2011; Korstanje & George
2
012). It is interesting to see how these findings contradict the literature that emphasizes
tourism as a pace-builder. Additionally, Jonker, Saayman & De Klerk (2009) studied
the factors necessary to engage demands with the type of spectacle Sports Games offers.
These researchers conclude that the promotion of festival as well as “tourist products” is
integrated into the formation of expectancies, which is conducive to satisfaction. In that
way, instead of the economic factor, the most important variable of event-management
is personal satisfaction. Last but not least, Gonzalez-Reverté & Miralbell-Izard (2009)
argue convincingly that events should be framed into four possible grids, a) event as
brand builders, b) events as an indirect but not for that less strong business generator, c)
events as tactical levers and d) events as a vehicle for local pride. The orchestration of
intangible resources as pride, solidarity and trust are of paramount importance to
produce the necessary synergy to festivals captivates attendants. These spectacles offer
“a space of catharsis” where hierarchies blurred but at the same time, the mainstream
cultural values are reinforced. At some extent, event management exhibits a new type of
escapement for ordinary-people not only producing an atmosphere of rivalry and
excitement but recycling the stages of production and economy (Molloy 2002). Starting
from the premise that workforce is educated by the interplay of sports, Molloy adds, no
less true is that workers revitalize all their daily frustrations by adopting “a process of
retaliation” where the other´s success is internalized as an indicator of the in-group
superiority. Performing a fictionalized history, nation states appealed to produce
allegories around Olympic Games or World Cup Ceremonials in order to protect their
interests. Undoubtedly, in other terms, politics and Event Management are inextricably
intertwined (Molloy 2002).